I haven’t explicitly identified it until now, but it seems that I have a habit of putting exactly the same thing in my introductory paragraph in basically all of the posts in this series. This particular lesson doesn’t sound all that bad at first, but I can assure you that I have literally crashed a server by not following it.

Strongly Consider Whether You Can Put Something In a Shared Library

There are so, so many benefits to having a centralized core library you can depend on for your plugins with virtually no drawbacks whatsoever.

The first thing that comes to mind, of course, is having a set of pre-written classes available to you. For example, menus, handy utilities for things such as I/O, databases, and data management primitives. Chances are, if you are not using a central library, you are writing a significant amount of boilerplate in your non-trivial plugins. If that is the case, you should consider generifying what you have written so that it fits the purpose of multiple plugins. Although you might be spending more time now trying to write part of your core library and also the plugin that currently needs it, you will spend less time writing the same boilerplate later on. You can significantly increase productivity if you aren’t stuck writing basically the same thing for every plugin you write each time you write a new plugin. Secondly, it is inevitable that you will make mistakes, and as hard as I try to push for care and slowing down to think through your code, even I myself make mistakes as well. If you are writing similar or even the same code on each of your plugins, ALL of your plugins need to be updated in the case that you find out you’ve been doing it wrong the entire time. On the other hand, if all of your plugins depend on just one library, you only need to fix the bug once. The counterargument is often that you can minimize the impact of a mistake if you spot it when you write the same thing again. However, this is wishful thinking. This is not how it works in the real world. I would strongly argue that writing boilerplate is a mindless activity. You are not likely to catch that you are making a mistake if you are writing the same code you wrote last time. On top of that, the more you get used to the same workflow, the more complacent you become, and more importantly, the bigger the cost of fixing that said code once it breaks. Think of it this way: if you only write the code once, then you only have that one chance to make a mistake. If you are writing the same code over and over again, you take that risk every. Single. Time. Thirdly, even if you Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V your code, there are still no guarantees. It might work for small snippets of code, but once you get to large amounts of boilerplate such as when writing inventory GUIs for example, then things start to fall apart. You still suffer from the possibility that the snippet you’ve been copying from is also wrong as well. You are not only duplicating what works across your entire codebase, you are also duplicating anything that potentially doesn’t. Again, the impact of a bug can be mitigated, but the cost of fixing it cannot. Do yourself a favor. When you are writing a lot of boilerplate that can be abstracted away, consider putting it on your core library.

A core library is not only good for putting your own code, but the code of others as well. You can shade various common dependencies into your core. The following argument is terrible, for obvious reasons, but you are reducing the total JAR sizes of all your plugins if only the one core plugin contains a big library. But, for those of you who are for some inexplicable reason scared of large JARs, then throwing everything into one super JAR file might help settle your conscience. For me personally, I need to configure certain libraries such as Guice that need their own namespaces each time I shade it using Maven, so it helps if I don’t even need to write anything extra by using a provided dependency on the central library. This isn’t to say that you should put every single dependency in your core library, but commonly used libraries like HikariCP are always helpful to have lying around, especially when a significant portion of your plugin ecosystem might depend on it. Again, I’m going back to the JAR size argument, but it also can’t hurt to reduce the amount of time it takes to download every other plugin if only the super JAR takes a long time since it has all the libraries shaded into it.

Finally, a core library can be used to enforce a specific standard or policy. For example, if you are including MySQL utilities, you can use the config.yml to provide the MySQL credentials to all the plugins using that core library. The server owner will not need to configure the credentials more than once. Secondly, by having a library of different utilities, you can centralize the way a certain action is performed. For example, you might want to make sure that caching is done in a particular way, or that all of the caches used on the various dependent plugins are configured to have a specific eviction time. By including this into the core library, you can enforce that specific policy on all of your plugins. You can even have a hierarchy of core plugins if certain developers prefer some other ways, or would like to use open-source core libraries instead. By changing specific portions of their desired library to comply with the “master” core library, they can use both the “master” and their custom core in conjunction, or simply utilize the custom library if the desired features are fully reimplemented.

It may actually take longer to maintain a core library if you are developing it alongside whatever plugin you need to complete because you are abstracting away some feature, but I can assure you that this effort is well worth it. Because your core library matures in the long run, it is a net gain rather than a loss as it becomes more and more useful. Had I have had the foresight to write my boilerplate into a centralized library, I would not have crashed servers and caused multitudes of plugins to have independent visual glitches as a result of making one mistake.


As has been tradition, I leave with the following from The Power of Ten:

If the rules seem Draconian at first, bear in mind that they are meant to make it possible to check code where very literally your life may depend on its correctness: code that is used to control the airplane that you fly on, the nuclear power plant a few miles from where you live, or the spacecraft that carries astronauts into orbit. The rules act like the seat-belt in your car: initially they are perhaps a little uncomfortable, but after a while their use becomes second-nature and not using them becomes unimaginable.

I’ve recently become more interested in Internet privacy. I consider myself to be relatively informed on the topic, but there are a lot of things that I’ve found that I didn’t know about within the past few weeks. I’ll be doing a post on that soon, because I think it is an issue worth talking about. And for readers who don’t think privacy is an important issue, I only ask that you hear me out. I’m not a popular blogger by any means, so if you are reading my blog in the first place, that probably indicates that you don’t have anything better to do anyways. I encourage you to use that time to become at least a little bit more informed :).

Addenum 2019-08-14 03:15

I hadn’t actually thought of this earlier, but I’ve recently run into another situation where a standardized library would have made life a lot easier. Especially in teams with several developers, providng a single paradigm provided by a core plugin makes the code easier for other developers to parse and less error prone. Because you can be assured that some portion of the code that calls on a standardized function works, you can debug and review code much faster at a reduced cost.